FAQ  •   Login  •   Register  •   Subscribe 

Welcome to the Forum for InventorSpot.com, the most popular invention related website in the world. Read our welcome message.

Skip to content

Moderators: Michelle, Scrupulous, Roger Brown, citizen


Can anyone swallow this?

Postby Levi Porter » Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:52 am

User avatar
Levi Porter
Brown Belt
 
Posts: 891
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:37 am
https://www.fbo.gov/files/390/39086a7bd ... d44739f34a

The highlighted areas are the revisions and additional emphases on critical areas of demand.

I can likely do a healthy percentage of half of the solicitation. I am just a one person team at the moment. It’s amazing how much similar language they use, and what they are trying to accomplish. I am really leaning towards appropriately contacting them. They have several various business arrangements at their disposal.

If anyone has experience with them and or familiar with this level of information technology, please let me know.

Thanks,

Levi

Postby Levi Porter » Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:58 pm

User avatar
Levi Porter
Brown Belt
 
Posts: 891
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:37 am
411 views and no response.

I was hoping someone would have something to say.

It is fairly narrowed and specialized.

I'll find em eventually.

Postby Scrupulous » Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:26 am

User avatar
Scrupulous
Black Belt
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 7:32 pm
Location: United States
Levi, that looks fairly technical. I think I kind of understand what they are asking for. But could you paraphrase what they're trying to do?

Postby Levi Porter » Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:00 pm

User avatar
Levi Porter
Brown Belt
 
Posts: 891
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:37 am
It has to deal with the fact that the volume of information technology is growing faster than existing operating systems, hardware & software programs / architectures, and applications can keep up with. Also, both hardware and software architectures and programs are generally created with only their idea in mind, without giving much consideration for the systems they have to work with. Also, they are trying to simplify the lengthiness of code for programs, and simultaneously reduce the virtually inevitable bottleneck areas where too many things are going on at once.

They have an interesting way they are going about it. They are breaking up the teams into architectures and programming. If you are chosen for architecture, you cannot do the software, and vice verse. Also, the programmers don't know which architectures they are programming.

I have solved quite a bit of it from a general contractor type of specifics, meaning that I know what is possible, what works, and how to tell the technicians what to do.

I don't want to actually apply for this, and will tell you in private about some of the other happenings.