makeworldbetter wrote:This is from your web site:
(http://www.absolutelynew.com/inventors/ ... phase2.php)Invention Licensing
Once the patent is received and the research is completed showing the market potential for your patent, the next step is invention licensing. Invention licensing is a contractual arrangement in which the inventor (you) rent or sell the rights to your patent to another company who will then produce, test and distribute the product in exchange for royalties. Once you've received your patent, you can either sell it or license it. For-sale patents are acquired by a company through an assignment agreement, which completely transfers the ownership of the patent. With patent licensing, the ownership remains with the inventor; the licensing simply grants the company the rights to make (produce), use (test) and distribute (sell) the product. Finding manufacturers to license your invention can often be a long and frustrating process, which is why firms like AbsolutelyNew exist.
AbsolutelyNew can assist you in obtaining patent registration and finding a manufacturer to license your inventions. AbsolutelyNew has an excellent track record of helping inventors secure lucrative licensing deals for their inventions.
You require patent before licensing?
mojo62 wrote:The rake is a go in my opinion.
I was wondering about what sort of licensing agreements you work
with inventors. Is it more in line with a 50/50 split on royalties? If you manufacture yourself, what kind of agreement do you provide.
I have a product to show and tell in the near future. I have mixed
emotions on it's direction at the moment, but I will be making a decision
in the near term. I may be interested in talking to you about it.
I think this product would be a top infomercial seller if filmed properly.
Average Inventor wrote:
Yeah, isn't it a more prudent idea to find out it's marketability before applying for a patent? If there isn't a suitable market then why get a patent?
makeworldbetter wrote:Not that we are complaining, we have a member who has 7 ideas got licensed with cost from him are under $100 each. He paid no patent fee, not event provisional patent fee on those ideas.
This method ease burden on inventor and enable him to work on more ideas.
I am not saying you should follow this approach, yet I think it's reasonable to start licensing process once certain due-diligent had been placed and the idea is patent pending (via provisional patent).
Michelle wrote:Hi Ben:
Welcome to the site.
If you would like to get involved in our community and get feedback on various inventions once in a while, we welcome that. The key is whether you are becoming a part of our site or just using it only for your or your company's benefit.
If I or any other active members feel you are just using this site as a means for advertising your company or spamming us with links to your website or otherwise taking advantage of the community here, we will ask you to take it somewhere else and strip references to your site off of these forums.
If you can show an invention in the forums, without linking to your site constantly and directing traffic there, that would work best. You are of course welcome like all active members to add your site to your signature.
So with that caution and request, welcome. We hope you will be a great resource and member of our community.