^^^ You need only look in the archives of all the American Inventor
threads. Remember what everybody was saying when American Inventor first came out? Oh, it was the bomb! Everybody was praising it, and the producers all day long. I remember when this site actually was called "American Inventor Spot".
At first, there was only a few disenters. And nobody liked hearing what they had to say. By the time Season 2 came around, nearly half of the inventors felt the same way. And now, look what everybody thinks about it... Just look in the archives, from when the show first started until the final threads.
You can see the progression toward the views of the original disenters.
I rest my case.
I first thought you were going to have an intelligent conversation or even debate. But I see who you are now. You are sneaky, with an original intent of snake style stabbing. Otherwise, you wouldn't go out of your way trying very hard to dismantle every single item that me or Whamzam says. If it was about having a sincere debate or disagreement, you wouldn't itemize every single thing.... A few points here and there maybe. But a meticulous disecting of every single sentence, makes it obvious where you are coming from.
On the one hand you say:
HAVE YOU SEEN THE NEWS STORIES OF THE POSTAL WORKER WHO DIDNâ€™T DELIVER HIS MAIL ROUTE ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS BECAUSE HE WAS TIRED THAT DAY AND DIDNâ€™T FEEL LIKE IT.
Then you hypocritically turn around and accuse Whamzam of being paranoid. And the fact is, you left out the fact
that none of those pieces of mail were registered or Express Mail (Which everybody uses to send patent applications anyways).
WHAT DOES AGE AND A BACKGROUND CHECK HAVE TO DO WITH IT.
Oh, so according to your theory, they may as well not even do background investigations on people of public trust. Let's just do away with investigating police officer applicants....
[quote]CLINTON HELD THE HIGHEST OFFICE IN THE U.S. LIED, CHEATED ON HIS WIFE, AND ASKED FOR A DEFINITION OF THE WORD â€œISâ€